 |
DSI / Prophet Forum a community of DSI and SCI synthesizer fans
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which MORPHO Keyboard color do you prefer? |
| BLACK |
|
71% |
[ 32 ] |
| YELLOW |
|
28% |
[ 13 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 45 |
|
| Author |
Message |
The Analog Organist
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 155 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MoPho = MonoPhonic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tubeampguy
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:50 am Post subject: Re: Which MORPHO Keyboard color do you prefer? |
|
|
| twenex wrote: | | Black or Yellow? |
It can be either color IMHO.
Just please change those plastic knobs to the Tetra black and gold type.
I added these to my Mopho. The original factory knobs have really sloppy tolerances.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SCI-DSI

Joined: 14 Sep 2008 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just WOOD and BLUE ! _________________
http://www.lewelsch.ch
*
P'08 Serial: 01425 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tixxican
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Mopho is yellow.
The keyboard version should have yellow also.
The only thing that I am unsure about is the gloss finish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tixxican
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Come on!...645 views and so little votes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom_1970
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimtheswede

Joined: 04 May 2008 Posts: 13
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Analog Organist
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 155 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm disappointed that DSI went with the yellow color for the MopPho Keyboard. Yes, it does make sense, considering the MoPho module itself. But - goodness gracious - it is ugly, even moreso than the original module, and for that reason alone I wouldn't buy one. Could you imagine that pasty yellow sitting atop the deep blue of an Evolver? But even more, the keyboard is too small. Anything smaller than three full octaves is out of the question for my needs.
Again, I wish DSI would produce a three or four oscillator monophonic synthesizer with a four-octave keyboard that complimented the Prophet '08 and was designed to look like it. Or even a Tetra Keyboard, since Dave seems to produce instruments in pairs. I do think there's room in the synthesizer world for a high quality monophonic instrument with all the standard DSI capabilities. Certainly, the Prophet '08 can be used as a monophonic instrument, but this isn't its strength. The monophonic mode is handy, but also a bit unnatural for it.
Moog Music need not own the monophonic market. Besides, some of us actually prefer DSI equipment over Moog. I've gradually become one such musician. I have a Voyager Old School and think it's a fabulous instrument. But the sound? Hmm.... It just sounds 70's archaic - that thick but kind of whiny tone that shouts, "Minimoog here!" Amazingly, I'm starting to get sick of it, and may even sell the instrument once and for all and liberate myself from the Moog cult. On the other hand, DSI equipment does not sound like the musical past. Its fairly unrecognizable tone gives you a fresh start in producing music that isn't associated with an era many of us would like to avoid or altogether forget.
I certainly like my Voyager, but I do loath the unmistakable sound of the 1970's. The Minimoog - even the new Voyager - definitely has that sonic association. I only hope Dave Smith gives us one more fresh full-sized professional quality analog mono synth to replace that old icon. _________________ "The purpose of music is the glory of God and the refreshment of the spirit."
- J. S. Bach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NV
Joined: 15 Jun 2010 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
My humble opinion: I LOVE how it looks. _________________ MoPho Keyboard #55, Tetra #1321 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pym
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 153 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know what's fascinating... we had Tetras and Mophos up at NAMM this last year and originally had them on separate tables. It was a landslide with people going to the Mopho table. After talking with people, it seems the yellow makes them look a hell of a lot more FUN. The Tetras are the more mature big brother, slightly more sophisticated but still dirty as hell deep down
Also, the pictures really make it look horrible... I didn't like the yellow until I saw it in person
| The Analog Organist wrote: | I'm disappointed that DSI went with the yellow color for the MopPho Keyboard. Yes, it does make sense, considering the MoPho module itself. But - goodness gracious - it is ugly, even moreso than the original module, and for that reason alone I wouldn't buy one. Could you imagine that pasty yellow sitting atop the deep blue of an Evolver? But even more, the keyboard is too small. Anything smaller than three full octaves is out of the question for my needs.
Again, I wish DSI would produce a three or four oscillator monophonic synthesizer with a four-octave keyboard that complimented the Prophet '08 and was designed to look like it. Or even a Tetra Keyboard, since Dave seems to produce instruments in pairs. I do think there's room in the synthesizer world for a high quality monophonic instrument with all the standard DSI capabilities. Certainly, the Prophet '08 can be used as a monophonic instrument, but this isn't its strength. The monophonic mode is handy, but also a bit unnatural for it.
Moog Music need not own the monophonic market. Besides, some of us actually prefer DSI equipment over Moog. I've gradually become one such musician. I have a Voyager Old School and think it's a fabulous instrument. But the sound? Hmm.... It just sounds 70's archaic - that thick but kind of whiny tone that shouts, "Minimoog here!" Amazingly, I'm starting to get sick of it, and may even sell the instrument once and for all and liberate myself from the Moog cult. On the other hand, DSI equipment does not sound like the musical past. Its fairly unrecognizable tone gives you a fresh start in producing music that isn't associated with an era many of us would like to avoid or altogether forget.
I certainly like my Voyager, but I do loath the unmistakable sound of the 1970's. The Minimoog - even the new Voyager - definitely has that sonic association. I only hope Dave Smith gives us one more fresh full-sized professional quality analog mono synth to replace that old icon. |
_________________ Chris Hector
Dave Smith Instruments |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Analog Organist
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 155 Location: New England
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Then I guess my issue is that I take music seriously, and I want my instruments to reflect that seriousness regarding both capabilities and appearances. That's why I like the Prophet '08 so much; it looks dignified and sounds fabulous. Whereas the MoPho Keyboard looks like a big bumble bee, like a bright little toy you'd give your kids to play with on the floor. I realize its design makes good marketing sense, since the bright color is easily identifiable and makes for much free advertising. But for me, it's a total turn off in terms of both appearance and keyboard size. I'm a DSI fan, so it's not so easy for me to say these things.
Since I'm in the field of classical music, I have no interest in the"fun" or "dirty as hell" aspects of music. They're qualities to be shunned in the pursuit of the beautiful. DSI might be wise to keep people like myself in mind. As a church organist who uses his instruments for practicing, recording, and performing outside of church, I can thoroughly enjoy both the Prophet and Evolver lines. Add a hefty set of bass pedals to the DSI set up, and you have a potential for beautiful music that rivals organs, pianos, harpsichords, and so on. All I'm saying, DSI, is that, as you design future equipment, you should consider musicians who play something other than rock and jazz, who have no use for "distortion," "hack," "feedback," and so on, but who otherwise are thrilled with your instruments. If you go the direction only of "dirty as hell," you'll certainly lose our business. Perhaps it's not a concern to you, but I wanted to put in a word for us. If you search the internet, and especially Youtube, you'll find that there is a surprising number of us who produce classical music on professional synthesizers. In designing future instruments, please don't dicount us. We're the ones who will always buy your most expensive instruments - if they're fine musical instruments. And don't forget, the loss of the Andromeda A6 has left a huge vacuum in the polyphonic analog synthesizer world, and many of us are searching for an instrument to fill it.
Two more things: notice the voting results above. The vast majority of those of us who actually BUY DSI equipment favored the black design, rather than the bumble bee yellow. Perhaps you could offer the two designs at the same time. Also, I think a reasonably priced Tetra Keyboard with a four-octave manual would be an instant hit and would offer Moog some serious competition. Afterall, Dave has made keyboards out of his other desktop modules. Why not finish the job? _________________ "The purpose of music is the glory of God and the refreshment of the spirit."
- J. S. Bach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pym
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 153 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not quite that simple, the people who post on the forum seem to like the black, yeah, but we've had pretty overwhelming positive response to the yellow color from all sources combined. Not to say I'm not listening but we're trying different things, each has pros and cons, one of the next products will likely return to the more 'professional' color scheme.
I'm also a classical pianist originally and definitely understand your point of view on this one, the feel of the instrument aesthetically influences the way you treat it as an instrument. A synth that looks professional, you treat like a professional synth... same goes with one that looks like a toy, even if it doesn't feel or sound like one. I wish we had more flexibility in the design area but we're a small company and a lot of the corners we cut to get the synths out end up influencing the design heavily. In the end, the sound ALWAYS comes first. _________________ Chris Hector
Dave Smith Instruments |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Analog Organist
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 155 Location: New England
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Chris. I appreciate your time and thoughts. _________________ "The purpose of music is the glory of God and the refreshment of the spirit."
- J. S. Bach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CowboyINC
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 160 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Analog Organist wrote: | | All I'm saying, DSI, is that, as you design future equipment, you should consider musicians who play something other than rock and jazz, who have no use for "distortion," "hack," "feedback," and so on, but who otherwise are thrilled with your instruments. |
While I'm sure the group you represent is of a respectable size of the market share, really, MOST people who buy analog synths (and therefore most of DSI's market share) ARE going to want the 'dirty as hell', distortion, feedback, weird modulations, beeps, zaps, and other 'non-musical' sounds (I know these can make a classical afficiondo's blood boil) and what have you. You can't expect a company of 5 people to be able to provide products that please everyone like Roland, Korg, Yamaha, etc. like to do with their 'workstations' (Triton, Fantom, etc.). Naturally they will find the most readily-available and profitable market and cater to that demand.
You seem to have a set of needs that is unique to most other users of this forum. I respect that you pull thru and stick with DSI, even though in reality, these products may be more aimed towards the 'dirty as hell' electronic music producers such as myself. But you can and do use them for classical music, and that's fantastic!
P.S. I think the yellow looks great. Looks like a toy? Maybe, but I also have a circuit-bent TX Instruments Speak & Spell which actually IS (or was) a toy, so I have no problem with stuff like that. _________________ #01933 P'08 PE Keyboard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Analog Organist
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 155 Location: New England
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
All true, CowboyINC, and reasonably said. But I thought I'd put a word in for a class of synthesists that is relatively invisible, quiet, and yet, quite active and dedicated to their craft.
By the way, don't get the impression that I'm a snooty highly skilled virtuoso. By no means. Some of you could probably run circles around me on a keyboard. I simply love classical music, rather than rock, jazz, or any other contemporary style. It often comes with age and life experience! _________________ "The purpose of music is the glory of God and the refreshment of the spirit."
- J. S. Bach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|